ChatGPT problem-solving abilities challenge college students – but limitations emerge

In a test of intelligence, ChatGPT outperformed human students. Despite AI’s high accuracy rate, however, a few loopholes remain.

Share the post

In a study published in the Nature Human Behaviour journal, psychologists at the University of California Los Angeles demonstrated how the AI language model ChatGPT possesses problem-solving abilities that rival – and, in some cases, even surpass – those of college students in the United States. This revelation sheds light on the burgeoning role of artificial intelligence in education, while also highlighting AI’s inherent limitations.

The study set out to assess the predictive capacity of ChatGPT by subjecting it to a battery of intricate image-related problems. These problems closely resembled the complexity found in standardized tests such as the SAT, a crucial component of the US college admissions process. Astonishingly, ChatGPT successfully solved 80 percent of intelligence-based problems, showcasing its ability to tackle complex reasoning tasks.

To provide a basis for comparison, the researchers at UCLA also enlisted the help of approximately 40 undergraduate students. These students were tasked with solving the same set of complex problems. Surprisingly, the results showed that ChatGPT outperformed the students; the humans achieved only a 60 percent accuracy rate. This stark contrast underscores the proficiency of ChatGPT in certain types of problem-solving tasks.

However, it is essential to note that ChatGPT is not without its limitations. Lead Researcher Taylor Webb emphasized that the AI model faced difficulties when presented with tasks involving social interactions, mathematical logic, and specific problem-solving scenarios, such as transferring objects from one container to another.

These limitations highlight the fact that, while advanced, ChatGPT is not at the level of fully generalized human intelligence. Nevertheless, it has undoubtedly made significant strides in specific areas of problem-solving.

ChatGPT in the classroom?

The introduction of ChatGPT into the education sector has raised concerns worldwide, particularly regarding potential student plagiarism. A survey conducted by Best Colleges revealed that many academic institutions chose to restrict access to the AI tool to prevent cheating incidents. Some institutions even issued stern warnings to their students, advising against using AI-based solutions to complete their assignments.

Experts in the education sector, however, maintain that while AI tools may facilitate assignment completion, they do not replace or diminish the importance of critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Jenna Lyle, a spokeswoman for the New York City Department of Education, emphasized that ChatGPT, despite its prompt and easy responses to various questions, falls short in instilling the vital skills required for academic excellence.

ChatGPT in Harvard curriculum

In a notable development, Harvard University recently announced plans to integrate AI into its computer science curriculum. Starting in the upcoming fall semester, computer science students at Harvard will be able to use AI to identify errors in their code.

Harvard’s CS50 course will be taught entirely by a chatbot, underscoring the growing influence of AI in the field of education. This move by Harvard signifies a significant shift towards incorporating AI as a valuable educational tool, while also acknowledging the need for humans to collaborate with AI for improved learning outcomes.

The study conducted by UCLA researchers showcases the impressive problem-solving capabilities of ChatGPT, highlighting its potential in the education sector. However, it also underscores the AI’s limitations, particularly in tasks involving social interactions and certain problem-solving scenarios.

As AI continues to evolve, its role in education will likely expand, but educators and institutions must carefully consider how to strike the right balance between leveraging AI’s strengths and preserving the essential human elements of learning and critical thinking.

banner place

What to read next...