HEPI board member shares insights on the dynamic shifts in UK research landscape

In a thoughtful piece recently featured on the Higher Education Policy Institute blog, David Sweeney, research policy professor at the University of Birmingham and a HEPI Advisory Board member, dove deeply into the transformative journey of the research system. He painted a detailed picture of the research sector’s nuanced changes, touching on governmental roles, international collaboration, and evolving research goals.

The spark for Sweeney’s exploration was renowned geneticist Paul Nurse’s testimony in April before the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee. Nurse, referencing his Review of the Research Landscape, introduced the concept of “revolution by evolution.” This stresses that while the research system has undergone alterations, it hasn’t always garnered as much attention as changes in education.

Key points from Sweeney’s analysis:

1. Government-research dynamics
   Sweeney outlines the evolving relationship between governmental bodies and research entities. He emphasizes the UKRI’s role in shaping accountability and the 2017 Higher Education and Research Act’s bolstering of the Haldane Principle for research autonomy.
2. Global interactions
   The U.K.’s pivotal role on the global research stage is spotlighted. Known for its appeal to researchers worldwide, the UK stands as a preferred collaborator rather than just a competitor. Yet, Brexit and reduced European ties may present future challenges.
3. Defining research success
   Moving beyond traditional metrics, Sweeney elaborates on the broader view of research success. He draws attention to the government’s focus on the societal effects of research, showcased by initiatives like the Research Excellence Framework.
4. Evolving structures and funding
   The article delves into the gradual tilt towards university-led research, enriched by alliances between research entities and educational institutions. Sweeney sheds light on funding mechanisms like the Transparent Approach to Costing which harmonizes public and university funding allocations.

In his concluding remarks, Sweeney encourages contemplation on the research system’s trajectory. He asks if the continuous subtle shifts might warrant a more dramatic overhaul. He also draws attention to pressing topics like research culture, career paths, and inclusivity, suggesting HEPI should facilitate these conversations in upcoming years.

In essence, Sweeney’s article offers a rich tapestry of the intricate changes within the research world over two decades. It serves as an enlightening guide for those engaged in research, policymaking, and higher education, prompting essential conversations about the direction and focus of research in the UK and beyond.