Concerns prompt Universities UK to review admissions processes

One key factor influencing the scrutiny of international student recruitment is the financial disparity in tuition fees.

Share the post
Photo via Pixabay

Amid concerns on the recruitment of international students, Universities UK, representing 142 institutions, has announced a comprehensive review of university admissions processes.

The organization emphasized the importance of instilling confidence in students, their families, and the government that the system is fair, transparent, and robust. This move comes in response to accusations of universities allegedly compromising standards to attract overseas students who pay higher tuition fees.

In a statement, Universities UK said, “There has been a significant focus on recruitment practices relating to international students in recent weeks.

“While many aspects of the reporting misrepresented the admissions process and criteria, it is vital that students, their families, and government have confidence that the system is fair, transparent, and robust.

“Where there is practice that falls below the standards expected of our universities and their representatives, we will take action.”

Recent media coverage has raised questions about the admission practices, with a Financial Times report suggesting that the University of York was lowering entry requirements for international students. The university’s vice-chancellor defended the approach, characterizing it as a “more flexible approach” consistent with practices for domestic students. 

Additionally, a Sunday Times report alleged that international students were utilizing “secret routes” to secure admission to Russell Group universities, a claim refuted by the group, which clarified that the reporting incorrectly conflated foundation year programs with degree programs.

To address these concerns, Universities UK is undertaking three immediate actions. First, a rapid review of foundation programs for both international and domestic students will assess their quality and comparability. Second, the Agent Quality Framework, which governs checks and balances when universities enlist agents for international student recruitment, will undergo a thorough review. Lastly, the Admissions Code of Practice, outlining expectations for university processes, will also be revisited.

One key factor influencing the scrutiny of international student recruitment is the financial disparity in tuition fees. While domestic students face a capped maximum annual tuition fee of £9,250, international students can pay significantly higher fees, with undergraduate courses costing £38,000 per year and postgraduate courses at £30,000 per year. Universities argue that these fees haven’t kept pace with inflation, diminishing their real value.

The influx of international students has notably risen in recent years, primarily driven by applications for postgraduate degrees, such as master’s programs, as opposed to undergraduate courses. A study from the University of Oxford on migration patterns supports this trend.

In response to these developments, the Universities UK Board is taking proactive measures to address potential shortcomings. These measures include a detailed examination of foundation programs, ensuring they meet prescribed standards for both domestic and international students. The review of the Agent Quality Framework aims to enhance oversight and accountability in the recruitment process, particularly when using third-party agents. Simultaneously, a careful reassessment of the Admissions Code of Practice seeks to reinforce and clarify expectations regarding university admission processes.

It is crucial to note the broader context of these changes, as the UK government has set an ambitious target of hosting 600,000 international students annually by 2030, a goal already surpassed twice. This underscores the delicate balance between maintaining high academic standards and attracting a diverse pool of international students, a challenge that universities are navigating in the evolving landscape of higher education.

banner place

What to read next...